<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Community: The American Way of Living : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/community-the-american-way-of-living/10647/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-05-19T15:08:35-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Community: The American Way of Living"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<br />
It's great to know about the ways of living in America, in my future I am planning to have my work in United States through your post I have gained an idea which I will just kept until I came there.<br />
<br />
America is one of the most that people loves to go because of itâs a amazing places and a lot of opportunity to be found there. Thanks!<br />]]></description>
	<author>Maye</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/community-the-american-way-of-living/10647/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-05-19T15:08:35-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Community: The American Way of Living"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[The planning and development of recreational trails frequently confronts the privacy vs. connectivity polarity head-on. A current project to connect two suburban townships to Philadelphia's Fairmount Park mobilizes vivid public discourse. The planning and design of trails and public transportation facilities provides design professionals with a wonderful opportunities to participate in the ongoing drama shaping a 21st Century America. <br />
<br />
Transit and trails are great places of encounter. <br />
<br />
]]></description>
	<author>Charles Brenton</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/community-the-american-way-of-living/10647/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2009-10-16T09:25:51-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Community: The American Way of Living"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[An important thesis  - and glad to see it explored in Rotterdam. Of course these theories have been around for years (in particular, the authors should reference, perhaps they do elsewhere, "Everyday Urbanism" by Chase, Crawford, Kaliski, et. al. which covered this exact same territory a decade ago - and then again this past year when their book was republished).<br />
<br />
There is however a critique of this genre of thought which the authors pay lip service to but never really answer. Mainly, the Everyday, even the everyday of the open city, often does not need and indeed rejects architects and the acts of architecture and urban design, even when the architect comes to them with open arms. The Everyday also often denies architecture culture and as a result falls prey far too often to being, to quote the authors, "notoriously conservative".<br />
<br />
This article may tell us from a social and political point of view why we should value these open urban environments, but, does it necessarily follow from a cultural standpoint that many of the forms illustrated herein are anything more than crude and sometime touching symbolic manifestations of people struggling to find a place for themselves, ignorant of the history and culture of architecture and urbanism and craft? This type of production with lack of knowledge or memory of any propelling aesthetic and/or liberal design value may not be philosophically humanistic.<br />
<br />
I think this constitutes a problem, when the role of architecture and architects is left unsituated, or diminished by the everyday process through which it comes into being.<br />
<br />
Other than as a statement of political consciousness, to misquote Wendy's Hamburger Chain, "what and where is the everyday architecture and urban design beef?"]]></description>
	<author>Samantha Tsai</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/community-the-american-way-of-living/10647/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2009-10-15T02:09:58-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Community: The American Way of Living"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I am sympathetic to this perspective, but I think there is a forgotten middle landscape: the so-called "inner ring" suburbs, which are suburbs in name only. My analysis of where diversity is currently strongest is the pre-1920 neighborhood of mid-density - not Jacobs' dense inner core, not the 1950s tract development, and not sprawl. In Chicago, these are neighborhoods like Portage Park, West Ridge, and Berwyn.<br />
<br />
These places are in danger of losing their diversity - tipping either to gentrification or disinvestment. Before we jump all the way out to Post WW-II suburbia and offer our help sustaining whatever emergent diversity is in evidence there, let's focus on the existing diverse places that are struggling to stay that way.]]></description>
	<author>Emily Talen</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/community-the-american-way-of-living/10647/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2009-10-13T12:37:09-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


