<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Re-Inhabited Circle Ks : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/re-inhabited-circle-ks/11057/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-31T03:03:17-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Re-Inhabited Circle Ks"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<br />
Thatâs something,That's what I was thinking.Brilliant idea.]]></description>
	<author>iphone revolution</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/re-inhabited-circle-ks/11057/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2009-12-31T03:03:17-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Re-Inhabited Circle Ks"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[This is definately a statement on the economy, and also one about recycling.  Seeing the landscapes gives an interesting view of the west.  However There is only so much one can do before it seem repetitive.  ]]></description>
	<author>Sammie</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/re-inhabited-circle-ks/11057/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2009-11-02T11:34:16-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Re-Inhabited Circle Ks"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Whoa, Andy. Some people enjoy very much looking at this type of landscape piece. Do you feel left out somehow?<br />
<br />
I would hesitate to ponder your feelings about a photograph of a woman's buttocks. They've been doing that awhile, too.]]></description>
	<author>Ricky Tick</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/re-inhabited-circle-ks/11057/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2009-10-30T16:35:33-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Re-Inhabited Circle Ks"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I wish I could be more charitable to these as a set of photographs, but they're really boring. They're a boring subject, photographed in a boring way. This style of photography was done to death in the 1970s by art school photographers across the country, and was a firmly entrenched clichÃ© of the field by the early 1980s. Probably over 1000 MFA thesis projects were launched on similarly boring subjects, cataloged and recorded in similar photos.<br />
<br />
This strategy has not become more interesting with the passing of time. Bring something fresh to the approach, or go home!]]></description>
	<author>Andy Ross</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/re-inhabited-circle-ks/11057/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2009-10-30T12:50:43-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Re-Inhabited Circle Ks"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[It is very well possible that all of the old Circle K's are the brainchild of architect Ralph Haver. In his portfolios, he is credited with designing the "Circle K Prototype" in the early 50s that I believe is what we experienced as hundreds of Circle K's across AZ and NM - with all of its subtle variations (especially in the walls flanking the windows which often use decorative CMU). Circle K abandoned this trade dress in the 60s/70s (?) and the buildings were either sawn-off at the overhang and redressed, or sold and converted into small businesses. <br />
<br />
They are perfectly adapted for independent businessmen not wishing to be part of a larger strip mall, loved for their huge angled beams and cantilevered roofs (witness the abandon with which they are adorned with Mexican beer flags and banners), and come in a variety of flavors that are a delight to identify on your next road trip or jaunt across town. Next time you are in a repurposed Circle K, take a look at the angled beams and the hardware, and compare to another commercial structure of Haver's like Copenhagen/Lou Regester. Don't bother calling Circle K, the corporation has changed hands so many time their PR department has nothing for us on the history of these prototypes.  <br />
<br />
Great job Paho -- I saw the series of photos at New American City a few years back and having grown up with these buildings have a fondness for them, Haver or not.]]></description>
	<author>Alison King, Modern Phoenix</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/re-inhabited-circle-ks/11057/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2009-10-30T00:54:01-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Re-Inhabited Circle Ks"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[sorry to sound like a nag, but in my browser, but the link to the slide show is set up wrong. clicking on the slide show sends me to the main page for 'places.']]></description>
	<author>Nicholas</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/re-inhabited-circle-ks/11057/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2009-10-29T13:56:09-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


