<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Green Metropolis: Review of the Book by David Owen : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/green-metropolis-new-york-david-owen/13368/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-05-12T04:23:29-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Green Metropolis: Review of the Book by David Owen"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[really nice shot though! ]]></description>
	<author>Rebecca Hassan</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/green-metropolis-new-york-david-owen/13368/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-05-12T04:23:29-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Green Metropolis: Review of the Book by David Owen"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I can understand your viewpoint. Yet â in defense of our reviewer â I don't think the essay really sets up an LA/NYC dichotomy, in particular. Following Owen's thesis, it explores a high density/low-density dichotomy, for sure, yet Tim Beatley expresses some skepticism even about that, suggesting that Owen's stance is too categorical, especially in setting up Manhattan as a model. <br />
<br />
In any case, we chose the images not to target LA. Certainly the Long Island Expressway could've been used to depict the same traffic as I-5 â and Owen would see both roads as part of the problem. But isn't the 3rd Street Promenade still mostly an exception to the LA rule? <br />
<br />
More generally, I wonder: wouldn't a less 'stereotypical' selection â one that ran counter to Owen's thesis â have confused matters? ]]></description>
	<author>Nancy Levinson</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/green-metropolis-new-york-david-owen/13368/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-05-11T23:08:17-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Green Metropolis: Review of the Book by David Owen"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the summary & analysis of Owen's ideas. His approach has its flaws but the thesis is sound. However, the LA/NYC dichotomy of this essay is unoriginal and misleading. The photo selection is especially disappointing. Juxtaposing I-5 and Times Square? I could show you the Long Island Expressway and Santa Monica's 3rd street promenade... A less stereotypical selection could have counteracted Owen's own tendency to treat cities as symbols rather than real places.]]></description>
	<author>James</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/green-metropolis-new-york-david-owen/13368/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-05-11T02:51:36-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


