<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>China Portfolio: From the Linked Hybrid to the Bug Dome  : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/china-portfolio-from-the-linked-hybrid-to-the-bug-dome/14768/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-07-31T00:30:33-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "China Portfolio: From the Linked Hybrid to the Bug Dome "]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I go to these places daily. Surprised nevertheless to see a few new spots in your list.  In Shenzhen the unique buildings are usually surrounded by messes-shoddy old low-rises, boring boxes, triple-parking tangles. But I've noticed Shanghai especially has succeeded in making whole neighborhoods modern, clean, and enjoyable. This trend should become more the rule as China's urban revamp proceeds. ]]></description>
	<author>Ed Irons</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/china-portfolio-from-the-linked-hybrid-to-the-bug-dome/14768/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-07-31T00:30:33-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


