<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Frederick Law Olmsted's Campaign for Public Health : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/frederick-law-olmsted-and-the-campaign-for-public-health/15619/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-11-18T20:44:53-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Frederick Law Olmsted's Campaign for Public Health"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Re: parks provision, I find it interesting that some of the concerns about public health in the 19th c. had to do with moral/cultural health whereas today the emphasis is primarily on physiological health.]]></description>
	<author>Georgia via local ecologist</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/frederick-law-olmsted-and-the-campaign-for-public-health/15619/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-11-18T20:44:53-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Frederick Law Olmsted's Campaign for Public Health"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[thank you for the article.<br />
parks for the reason you cite is also a venerable old argument, Mark.  Check out the argument for the 1811 commissioners gridiron plan of new york city (and I'm guessing they were referencing other, earlier precedents or theories).<br />
<br />
It makes me wonder, however, given our current focus on quantitative analysis (ecosystem services, for example) does Axelrod get into what size certain parks must be in order to get air moving, or if topography and % of forest cover factor in?  That would be interesting...]]></description>
	<author>faslanyc</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/frederick-law-olmsted-and-the-campaign-for-public-health/15619/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-11-18T17:36:12-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Frederick Law Olmsted's Campaign for Public Health"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Great article!<br />
It strikes me that recent sustainble planning approaches, like the research of Jim Axelrod at Yale, include parks to again serve as the 'lungs of the city'.  Now, however, they are seen to provide better aerodynamics for the shape of cities in order to get air moving and cooling them naturally.]]></description>
	<author>Mark Simon</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/frederick-law-olmsted-and-the-campaign-for-public-health/15619/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-11-18T15:12:30-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Frederick Law Olmsted's Campaign for Public Health"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I'm shocked that this article made no reference to Olmstead's plan and work on Boston's Fens, Muddy River and Emerald Necklace.  While this work is now primarily appreciated for the magnificent network of parks and public spaces, it was fundamentally necessitated for reasons of flood control and public health.<br />
<br />
The Muddy River and the Fens were essentially pestilential swamps, and Boston suffered outbreaks of disease directly related to their poor sanitation and drainage.  The genius of Olmstead's work is that while altering hydrology and solving essential civil engineering problems (that allowed adjacent areas to become developed and creating the roadways to serve them), he simultaneously created a pastoral landscape which continues to work admirably for flood control.  <br />
<br />
In solving health and safety issues, he was able to create substantial public amenities, which have continued to bear enormous benefit from the public and private development nearby that had been made possible.  What appears recreational and ornamental is often performing yeoman work on behalf of public health, safety and economic development.]]></description>
	<author>Jon Seward</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/frederick-law-olmsted-and-the-campaign-for-public-health/15619/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-11-17T20:27:34-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Frederick Law Olmsted's Campaign for Public Health"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[The extent and range of F. L. Olmstead's civic engagement and public service during the Civil War is also explored in the book, "Leadership By Design: Creating an Architecture of Trust", by Ambassador Richard N. Swett, FAIA, and co-authored by me.  Dr. Henry Bellows entrusted Olmstead with leading the organization of the Union League Club and helping to recruit the founding membership of one of NYC's most powerful advocacy groups of that time. The multiple networks that Olmstead was connected to as a human 'hub' brought together the best and brighest minds of his day, including the founders of the AIA and National Association of Civil Engineers. Their interactions were critical to the success of the Sanitary Commission, and subsequently after the war, to the development of laws and institutions that guarded the public's well being in a host of critical areas, not least of which was the design of public spaces. A GREAT role model!!]]></description>
	<author>Colleen Thornton</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/frederick-law-olmsted-and-the-campaign-for-public-health/15619/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-11-17T15:14:47-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


