<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Dangers in the Air: Aerosol Architecture and Invisible Landscapes : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/dangers-in-the-air-aerosol-architecture-and-invisible-landscapes/18918/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-11-16T13:56:02-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Dangers in the Air: Aerosol Architecture and Invisible Landscapes"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Experimental historian - what a provocative title! Almost makes me want to go back to the humanities.]]></description>
	<author>Daniel erwin</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/dangers-in-the-air-aerosol-architecture-and-invisible-landscapes/18918/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-11-16T13:56:02-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Dangers in the Air: Aerosol Architecture and Invisible Landscapes"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Very interesting article.<br />
Although it got me thinking how post-structuralist/post-modern paradigms are leading us to politicise every single phenomenon in the world. This idea of the empowered 'breather' and the democratisation of the constitution of air is only possible under these ideologies. I wonder if we are not taking it too far.]]></description>
	<author>Gabriel</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/dangers-in-the-air-aerosol-architecture-and-invisible-landscapes/18918/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-11-06T16:05:21-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Dangers in the Air: Aerosol Architecture and Invisible Landscapes"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Air is such an important part of the environment and has so many design implications for its makeup, temperature, and circulation. We shouldn't avoid things we can't see, but considering we do it's great to see visualizations. Even if they get blurred or indecipherable as representations, the creative act of trying to figure out ways to show the unseen is powerful. <br />
<br />
http://builtecology.blogspot.com/2010/10/functional-ambiance-designing-for-clean.html]]></description>
	<author>Daniela</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/dangers-in-the-air-aerosol-architecture-and-invisible-landscapes/18918/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-10-25T12:15:37-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Dangers in the Air: Aerosol Architecture and Invisible Landscapes"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Nice overview.]]></description>
	<author>Zachary Sachs</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/dangers-in-the-air-aerosol-architecture-and-invisible-landscapes/18918/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-10-22T11:59:37-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Dangers in the Air: Aerosol Architecture and Invisible Landscapes"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Great article.<br />
<br />
Another interesting tangent could be how the same socio-political mechanisms of control over the treatment of air quality evidence themselves in architectural space and building programs. For instance, an airport or border station function like a air/water filtration system, sequestering particulates and defining other discrete zones of differentiation within itself such as smoking compartments or pods for sleeping - each with their own contained atmospheric condition.]]></description>
	<author>Jared Winchester</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/dangers-in-the-air-aerosol-architecture-and-invisible-landscapes/18918/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-10-22T01:11:25-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Dangers in the Air: Aerosol Architecture and Invisible Landscapes"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[This discussion should also include Public Smog, a work by artist Amy Balkin:<br />
<br />
http://www.publicsmog.org/<br />
<br />
From the project's website: "PUBLIC SMOG is a park in the atmosphere that fluctuates in location and scale. The park is constructed through financial, legal, or political activities that open it for public use.<br />
<br />
Activities to create Public Smog have included purchasing and retiring emission offsets in regulated emissions markets, making them inaccessible to polluting industries. "]]></description>
	<author>Tim Halbur</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/dangers-in-the-air-aerosol-architecture-and-invisible-landscapes/18918/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-10-21T14:01:28-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


