<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>American Glamour and the Evolution of Modern Architecture : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/american-glamour/23338/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-20T09:47:19-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "American Glamour and the Evolution of Modern Architecture"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I do agree that beauty has gone into mass production, but also think that the statement was a little harsh because of how he describes that modern beauty has changed because of our ability to only adorn and admire beauty through a lens and simply cannot create it. This is what he is getting at when he discusses the fact that beauty has changed into mass production of snap-shot camera photography posted all over the internet. Because, yes, the common person uses a camera in this way but anyone that truly appreciates a camera can take everyday objects and create something beautiful. But I enjoyed reading about the in's and out's of glamour.]]></description>
	<author>ian</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/american-glamour/23338/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2011-04-20T09:47:19-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "American Glamour and the Evolution of Modern Architecture"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[outstanding; thank you ]]></description>
	<author>Francisco </author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/american-glamour/23338/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2011-01-24T06:31:32-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "American Glamour and the Evolution of Modern Architecture"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[truth is beauty, beauty is truth, a la keats.  and might i add, ugly is ugly.  ]]></description>
	<author>blake</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/american-glamour/23338/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2011-01-22T11:18:25-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


