<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Lost Rivers: photographs by Alejandro Cartagena : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/lost-rivers/25638/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-03-28T09:21:46-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Lost Rivers: photographs by Alejandro Cartagena"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Old school methods saw diversion and enclosure a common treatment for flood control. In many areas this has gone the way of the dinosaur however. Protected multi purpose natural corridors defined by the greatest environmental or technical constraint line, and use of integrated stormwater management quantity and quality controls that protect the flow regime are a given now. Restoration is always possible but left alone naturalization will simply take over many of the pictured sites and photos in a few/several years will probably be much different. Some of the pictures seem to actually show a large degree of natural healing.  ]]></description>
	<author>Rolling Stone</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/lost-rivers/25638/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2011-03-28T09:21:46-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


