<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>The High Line : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/the-high-line/331/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-10-07T14:57:13-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "The High Line"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Great to read that the notion of "the structure be retained, refurbished and returned to the people of the city as singular open space" stretched back to the dawn of the century. An uncommon resource indeed â and one that's been handled with vision.]]></description>
	<author>Meena Kadri</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/the-high-line/331/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2010-10-07T14:57:13-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


