<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Flies in Urinals: The Value of Design Disruptions : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://changeobserver.designobserver.com/feature/flies-in-urinals-the-value-of-design-disruptions/33108/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-03-11T20:44:23-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Flies in Urinals: The Value of Design Disruptions"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I am currently in a graduate student in a class being taught by Andrew Shea and came across this article months ago (at the time I had no idea who Andrew Shea was so needless to say I am pleasantly surprised to find myself in his class now).  When I first read the article I was inspired about the capacity for design innovations to facilitate small shifts in our everyday behavior.  I like to think about how design can have reach (i.e.-spark a dialogue about an issue) beyond delivering aesthetic pleasure through interventions that are both critical and productive. This article represents a kind of thinking that I find useful and very much forward-looking.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://changeobserver.designobserver.com/feature/flies-in-urinals-the-value-of-design-disruptions/33108/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-03-11T20:44:23-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Flies in Urinals: The Value of Design Disruptions"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[There's a bit of history around the insects in urinals design story as well - in England and Australia porcelain urinals were decorated with an image of a bee for exactly the same reasons you outlined above.<br />
<br />
The joke was that the Latin name for bee is Apis, deftly highlighting the activity taking place!]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://changeobserver.designobserver.com/feature/flies-in-urinals-the-value-of-design-disruptions/33108/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-07-19T23:04:37-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Flies in Urinals: The Value of Design Disruptions"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Regretfully, the social design initiatives are desperatley attemtting to help the people in their individual fights with vice like drugs, smoking, etc. but rarely succeed in accomplishing their mission- so they need such a strong provocation with which to make impact. A schocking provocation, I would add. ]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://changeobserver.designobserver.com/feature/flies-in-urinals-the-value-of-design-disruptions/33108/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-06-01T09:40:38-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Flies in Urinals: The Value of Design Disruptions"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[So pleased to see that someone else has been pondering this problem.  Thank you for inspiring more people to the possibilities.  I do love Cindy Chang's work and have been aware of how the environment also directly signals cultural groupthink...in JPIM, my collaborator and I share a few other stories of how to create some revolutionary thinking by literally paying more attention to the environment...see Culture is KING, JPIM<br />
<br />
]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://changeobserver.designobserver.com/feature/flies-in-urinals-the-value-of-design-disruptions/33108/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-05-02T21:10:21-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


