<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Fixing South Street Seaport: Is New Architecture Enough? : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/fixing-south-street-seaport-is-new-architecture-enough/33838/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-05-05T18:06:48-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Fixing South Street Seaport: Is New Architecture Enough?"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I appreciate their arguments in that video for a historic but useful fabric. Although given their paean to keeping the original fish vendors and gritty businesses, and not developing them out it would be interesting to know if any of them are still there?...]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/fixing-south-street-seaport-is-new-architecture-enough/33838/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-05-05T18:06:48-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Fixing South Street Seaport: Is New Architecture Enough?"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I haven't been down to the SSSP since the late 60s, but I remember it as one of the first places we New Yorkers could go to get a sense of the city as an island and as a port. I know retail is important both to provide cash flow for the project and to lure visitors, but those big glass boxes don't give much of a sense of place. They could be anywhere. Of course, the reality is in the street level details.<br />
]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/fixing-south-street-seaport-is-new-architecture-enough/33838/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-05-03T00:42:53-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Fixing South Street Seaport: Is New Architecture Enough?"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I'm thinking of starting DoCoPoMo.  We would spend half our time lobbying for the preservations of buildings like this one, and half our time protesting and lbbying against the efforts of DoCoMoMo.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/fixing-south-street-seaport-is-new-architecture-enough/33838/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-04-25T05:09:52-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Fixing South Street Seaport: Is New Architecture Enough?"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I couldn't agree more, Alexandra. Neither tourists nor New Yorkers need another shopping mall. They have those back home and we have SoHo. We all need easily accessible spaces from which to enjoy the waterfront. It would be an unfortunate missed opportunity to lose this precious vista to the purely retail. Its purpose should be a bit more noble. After all, this IS New York.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/fixing-south-street-seaport-is-new-architecture-enough/33838/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-04-23T15:20:08-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


