<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Strelka Press: a new 'digital first' publisher of longform criticism (including mine). : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/introducing-strelka-press/34588/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-06-21T16:56:56-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Strelka Press: a new 'digital first' publisher of longform criticism (including mine)."]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[As a native of Silicon Valley I feel that it is underrated as a suburban community. Not far from where Steve Jobs lives is an enclave of Eichler homes (called Greenmeadows) built in the late â50s that are examples of mid-century modernism. These enclaves also exist in Mt. View, Cupertino, Sunnyvale, and San Jose. Most are within walking distance to work places, farmer's markets, and restaurants, and parks.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/introducing-strelka-press/34588/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-06-21T16:56:56-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Strelka Press: a new 'digital first' publisher of longform criticism (including mine)."]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[A world-wide trend: good urbanism is often very expensive, and the most beautiful places are often very expensive. Nantucket, Aspen (where MD's get housing subsidies), Charleston, south of Broad, Cambridge, Mass., way too much of London, way too much of Manhattan ... IMHO, San Francisco is one of the most grossly overpriced places in the US, supposedly to some degree because of all the Silicon Valley Millennials who prefer SF to SV.<br />
<br />
BTW, that's not disagreeing with anything you said. I do like downtown Palo Alto, though.<br />
<br />
So the good news is that we should be building more good urbanism.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/introducing-strelka-press/34588/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-06-15T22:42:11-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Strelka Press: a new 'digital first' publisher of longform criticism (including mine)."]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[In my Strelka essay, my focus is on the workplace urbanism of Silicon Valley, rather than the residential neighborhoods. I agree that Steve Jobs's neighborhood is beautiful and walkable, though most people I know who live there get in a car to work, shop and even exercise. However, his neighborhood is not an option for non-millionaires, and the SV companies have started to realize that their own employees have to live far from work. Some do it by choice, and are bused from San Francisco, but others can't find affordable housing, or find it in unwalkable areas. Their solution so far has been to build Main Streets in their own office villages, so while you are at work you can get a coffee, get your bike fixed or buy a gift. But that does nothing for the larger public realm or even for the employees when they are not at work (which is part of the point). As companies like Google and Facebook consider building housing near their campuses, the municipalities need to make sure these denser, mixed use developments are truly public, and work with wider civic agendas. Some of the developments will probably include apartments and condos rather than single-family homes, and Facebook's new "Main Street" even embraces some traditional architecture. The office interiors, however, are pure industrial loft.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/introducing-strelka-press/34588/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-06-15T20:53:51-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Strelka Press: a new 'digital first' publisher of longform criticism (including mine)."]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[First, Bravo! Strelka Press.<br />
<br />
Second, <em>Commenters said, in nice and not-so-nice ways, that you can't accuse a Silicon Valley company of being suburban, because there's no other option. But why then, I wondered, were companies like Facebook importing the coffee shops and bike stores, cafe culture and farmers markets of the city to those suburbs? What did they see in the city and, seeing that, why wouldn't they move there? </em><br />
<br />
I haven't read the Strelka book, but I presume you said there is a fair amount of good urbanism in Silicon Valley. And that so much of Silicon Valley goes home to the San Francisco at night that they are making that urbanism as expensive as Manhattan's.<br />
<br />
Steve Jobs lived in a beautiful English cottage in a wonderfully walkable neighborhood not far from downtown Palo Alto, which is a good downtown. The Google guys and lots of other Silicon magnates live a block or two away. Jobs understood the difference between where he chose to live and where he chose to build for work (although he also kept a small office in downtown Palo Alto, I think).<br />
<br />
At CNU 20, Richard Florida forcefully and passionately made the point that what he calls the Creative Class (like Google employees) want to live and work in traditional urbanism. He believes the evidence shows they don't want all the shrink-wrapped condo towers for the 1% that we seem to be building on every available site in Manhattan. The way that Silicon Alley edges down Broadway away from the towers of Madison Square might support that, although the Bowery is becoming another example of what Rem calls "an architectural petting zoo."]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/introducing-strelka-press/34588/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-06-15T11:48:02-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


