<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>The Once & Future Library : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/the-once--future-library/35268/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-07-23T10:41:11-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "The Once & Future Library"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[One thing seems clear.  The library is going to be a battleground for corporate copyright and control, like the e-reader.<br />
Carnegie established thousand of libraries as an end run around the cost of books as an impediment to knowledge. Rights management limits both the number and usefulness of electronic books through many of their useful lifespans increasing costs and decreasing volume for libraries.<br />
As much as I love physical books I see the e-reader being the clear winner in the same way cd's were vanquished by the inferior mp3 and ultimately changing the library to an online resource.<br />
]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/the-once--future-library/35268/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-07-23T10:41:11-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "The Once & Future Library"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I think it is a little too early to state that these competing technologies will &quot;shake&quot; out. As history shows us, I believe we are in a new genre of technology release. More and more, barriers are breaking down to fund, build and release new technologies than ever before. Are we past the point of achieving a new &quot;solid&quot; format like the television that had a hold on us for decades? Or is touch-screens simply the new remote-format that will stick around for decades to come? Are these organizations waiting for a future that will only out-date itself in couple years rather than couple decades in previous project lifespan expectations? Perhaps these organizations should design ]]></description>
	<author>Robert</author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/the-once--future-library/35268/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-07-22T12:31:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


