<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Why Architects Need Feminism: Defining a New Wave : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/why-architects-need-feminism/35448/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-10-06T05:43:40-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Why Architects Need Feminism: Defining a New Wave"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA['The problem with this article is it shows a group of women meeting in bookstores.'<br />
<br />
This seems a rather astonishing point of criticism, akin to criticizing Bluestockings in the nineteenth century. Where should female architects meet? Why not in bookstores? Or anywhere else for that matter? <br />
<br />
Implicit in the criticism is the idea that, if you're talking about practice, you're not out there doing it - a kind of resistance to actually questioning the methods and modes under which architects work. But surely such questioning is only a positive thing - for all architects, not only women?<br />
<br />
Moreover, talking about the reality of discrimination doesnât exclude talking about the work, which the article doesâand thatâs why the discussions happened in the bookstore in the first placeâto celebrate a book that discusses the work of women architects.  Peter Safe's use of a quote from Deborah Berke is misleading, because she has spoken out against the hurdles women and other minorities face and has argued for a level playing field for everyone: âAnyone who has the ability and desire to be an architect should be offered the opportunity to pursue the possibility of becoming one.â  As ever, the issue is how we get there.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/why-architects-need-feminism/35448/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-10-06T05:43:40-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Why Architects Need Feminism: Defining a New Wave"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[You may be interested in our essay on The Tragedy of Feminine Design http://tinyurl.com/cput9za]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/why-architects-need-feminism/35448/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-09-20T12:37:13-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Why Architects Need Feminism: Defining a New Wave"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA["Itâs important to me, but I see it as being important in the context of doing good work. I donât want to be differentiated as a woman architect, as though one is successful as a woman architect but not successful as an architect per se." - Deborah Berke to Architectural Record.<br />
The problem with this article is it shows a group of women meeting in bookstores. The focus should be on their architectural work, first and foremost. There is a great diversity in the types of projects women (and men) do for that matter, it probably shouldn't be defined in terms of a few avant-garde practitioners. And implying that feminist thought has introduced "building is a political and social act" surely doesn't understand architectural history. ]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/why-architects-need-feminism/35448/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-09-18T13:53:11-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Why Architects Need Feminism: Defining a New Wave"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[PARLOUR - WOMEN, EQUITY, ARCHITECTURE was  launched earlier this year in Melbourne Australia. It provides a space for speaking about exactly these issues. Worth a look as a follow up to this article.<br />
www.archiparlour.org<br />
]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/why-architects-need-feminism/35448/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-09-16T18:26:13-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Why Architects Need Feminism: Defining a New Wave"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Nice share I've tried reading the article in the Independent. It is a great article. Thanks for sharing.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/why-architects-need-feminism/35448/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-09-13T22:44:13-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Why Architects Need Feminism: Defining a New Wave"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[while I think it's very important to include this dialog at the academic level, the real problem is that there is an even greater lack of women in construction, property management, and development.  Policy that affects the built environment is also an area where there seems to be very few women in leadership positions.  Once more women start becoming more influential in the worlds of development and public policy, then I think the field of architecture will follow.  Architecture is at the mercy of the client and the law.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/why-architects-need-feminism/35448/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-09-13T15:56:51-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Why Architects Need Feminism: Defining a New Wave"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Congratulations on the article.<br />
a couple of years ago, pre children, I was aware of and participated in a couple of evening discussions on the broad theme of feminism and architecture in London, where I live and work. Has it all got a bit quiet and mainstream (not necessarily a bad thing) recently? Maybe a sister library in London should think of organising something similar. And provide a crÃ¨che. <br />
]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/why-architects-need-feminism/35448/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-09-12T16:45:49-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Why Architects Need Feminism: Defining a New Wave"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[In any discussion about feminism in architecture the following article is worth considering: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/architecture/elizabeth-wilbraham-the-first-lady-of-architecture-2215936.html]]></description>
	<author>John Kellett</author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/why-architects-need-feminism/35448/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-09-12T13:49:33-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


