<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>The Never-ending Struggle against Clutter : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/the-never-ending-struggle-against-clutter/35748/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-08-28T16:42:25-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "The Never-ending Struggle against Clutter"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[on this subject i recommend e.l. doctorow's homer & langley, a fictionalization of the story of new york's collyer brothers, titans of obsessive hoarding. <br />
<br />
i am in some sympathy with the obsessive hoarder, as i feel the perpetrators are generally harmless but to themselves, and their motivations sad but in some ways admirable--an impossible, ill-conceived attempt to grasp and retain all the knowledge in the world, and to somehow secure their small place in it. on the other hand we have those fetishists who obsessively order all that they acquire: ie, the bookshelf arranged by spine color. i must admit some sympathy for them also. but maybe we should force them all to move in together. ]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/the-never-ending-struggle-against-clutter/35748/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-08-28T16:42:25-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "The Never-ending Struggle against Clutter"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Thanks. The potential for extreme forms of clutter certainly has its roots in our culture's insatiable materialism. Where this becomes pathological, or disabling, is an interesting question. That was certainly the case with the hoarder seen in the BBC documentary reviewed in the link I gave in my piece. There's been a rash of media stories of this kind in recent years and the subject has been thoroughly Oprah-ed.<br />
<br />
As for the French bookseller, he may just have been poorly organized, an indifferent salesman, or having a bad day â two bad days. But his "shop" was totally different in its style of display (impenetrable stacks) from other well-organized used bookstores to be found in his part of town.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/the-never-ending-struggle-against-clutter/35748/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-08-28T08:51:18-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "The Never-ending Struggle against Clutter"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[The pathology of clutter might have its roots in our dysfunctional culture's insatiable materialism. But if that was the reason for it, it would not appear in other cultures, and it does. Clinically it's symptomatic of OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder, a DSM diagnosis that identifyies people who pathologically wash, check, or hoard. 

It is possible that your French bookseller is an OCD sufferer, but it's also possible there are other reasons he keeps a messy shop.]]></description>
	<author>ruthclaire weintraub</author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/the-never-ending-struggle-against-clutter/35748/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-08-28T04:22:52-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


