<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>A shiny new buzzword for those who analyze pseudo-events. : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/focusing-on-optics/35828/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-09-06T13:24:52-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A shiny new buzzword for those who analyze pseudo-events."]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Re the Eastwood thing: I'm surprised there wasn't more attention focused on the chair itself. I finally read somewhere today that it's sold at Design Within Reach. Invisible president not included, one assumes. ]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/focusing-on-optics/35828/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-09-06T13:24:52-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A shiny new buzzword for those who analyze pseudo-events."]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<b>Or Just Focusing On âthe chairâ</b><br />
<br /> <a target=" width="200" height="150" href=" https://twitter.com/BarackObama/status/241392153148915712/photo/1" target="_blank"><img <IMG HEIGHT=200 WIDTH=250 src="http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1148511.1346381246!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_635/eastwood-chair.jpg"></a> <br/> <br />
(click on image above)<br />
<br /> The pseudo-event of Clint Eastwood, the RNC âmysteryâ speaker, using an empty chair to symbolize President Obama during his speech.  But Obamaâs official account got the last word. âThis seatâs taken,â it said, adding a photo of Obama sitting in a chair emblazoned with the words âThe President.â  http://OFA.BO/c2gbfi , pic.twitter.com/jgGZTb02<br />
]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/focusing-on-optics/35828/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-08-31T03:47:55-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A shiny new buzzword for those who analyze pseudo-events."]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<b>Bending the Curve More Focusing On âOpticsâ</b><br />
<br /> William Safire also noted the trend â âOpticsâ is hot, rivaling contentâ in his final On Language column and Ben Zimmer wrote about how optics achieved buzzword status in NY Times. <br/><br />
<br />
<br /> <a target=" width="200" height="50" href=" http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/07/magazine/07FOB-onlanguage-t.html " target="_blank"><img <IMG HEIGHT=75 WIDTH=250 src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2010/03/07/magazine/07FOB-onlanguage-t_CA0/07FOB-onlanguage-t_CA0-articleLarge.jpg"></a> <br/> <br />
(click on image above)<br />
Lettering by Thomas Kim<br />
<br />
Thank you Rob<br />
]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/focusing-on-optics/35828/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-08-30T11:01:50-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A shiny new buzzword for those who analyze pseudo-events."]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Hi BPD (don't I know you from somewhere?), thanks for this, and a very good point about political "packaging." <br />
<br />
Meanwhile two other follow-ups from Twitterland: <br />
<br />
Thanks, @GautamRamdurai for this image macro: <br />
https://twitter.com/GautamRamdurai/status/240876669395673088<br />
<br />
And thanks to @AmbivalentGeek I now realize there's a hashtag for this subject: #optics. Of course there is! It's pretty much the perfect hashtaggable notion, no? <br />
https://twitter.com/AmbivalentGeek/status/240869344576425984]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/focusing-on-optics/35828/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-08-30T08:30:21-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A shiny new buzzword for those who analyze pseudo-events."]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I'm glad you're noting this trending buzzword. Its new meaning as "controlled surface aesthetics" seems to mean something similar to what "packaging" used to mean in a political context.<br />
<br />
By the way: it's no coincidence that the hurricane Isaac is coinciding with the Republican convention. It's God's way of punishing them for denying climate change.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/focusing-on-optics/35828/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-08-29T16:42:32-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


