<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Communicating Objects in Orhan Pamuk's Museum of Innocence : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/the-museum-of-communicating-objects/36588/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-10-07T07:15:51-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Communicating Objects in Orhan Pamuk's Museum of Innocence"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Mark, thanks for this, but is âderivativeâ a useful word here? Thereâs a well established tradition of âbox artâ â by Joseph Cornell (the obvious master), Georges Hugnet, JiÅÃ­ KolÃ¡Å, the Fluxus artists, Arman, Marcel Broodthaers, and many others. Thatâs the art context for Pamukâs boxes and he must be aware of it, but I donât think this work should be assessed in purely art terms â Pamuk makes no overt claims for it as art. If we did this, weâd be overlooking its literary, social, museological and architectural dimensions. (I havenât discussed the building, but the hollowing out of the interior and use of vertical space to form the galleries is very nicely done. Itâs like ascending through a timber-built, multi-levelled, <i>Wunderkammer</i>.) One might just as validly consider the project in relation to the tradition of literary illustration, in which context it might seem boldly original rather than derivative. The museum is a hybrid.<br />
<br />
Precious? I think you would have to say more about what you mean by that. What would a non-precious project on this scale look like? Or is the mere idea of undertaking such a project precious? One could say that about so many cultural ideas and projects pursued with an obsessive attention to detail. The question for me is: does it work in its context? Obviously I think it does, but you would need to go there to decide.<br />
<br />
âPretentiousâ suggests heâs making some over-large claim that the museum doesnât fulfil. Again, the only way of deciding whether thatâs so is to experience the museum as a totality in its neighborhood â a neighborhood dense with junk shops and antique shops from which these objects have been sourced (see my <a target="_blank" href="http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/the-strange-afterlife-of-common-objects/34238/">previous post</a> about the museum). Anyone who finds old objects and found images a source of fascination is going to have a field day in The Museum of Innocence. For non-Turkish visitors, the contents of these boxes also provide intimate and revealing glimpses of a society and culture that may be unfamiliar.<br />
<br />
In <i>The Innocence of Objects</i>, Pamuk discusses the long gestation of the project in the most direct, personal and unpretentious of terms. The tone of the writing is quite different from art writing and he makes no attempt to âtheorizeâ his creation. He writes as a novelist interested in social history, in the emotional lives of his characters, and in the way that objects can become charged with associations and memories.<br />
]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/the-museum-of-communicating-objects/36588/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-10-07T07:15:51-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Communicating Objects in Orhan Pamuk's Museum of Innocence"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[i really want to like this. the tableaux are beautiful. pamuk is a wonderful writer, and so admirable as a cultural force. there is quite evidently an amazing commitment of work and effort and thought and money. but....derivative, precious, and pretentious are words that i'm having trouble scrubbing from my mind. maybe it can be those things and still be powerful and full of meaning. i would love to see it in person.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/the-museum-of-communicating-objects/36588/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-10-06T11:30:38-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Communicating Objects in Orhan Pamuk's Museum of Innocence"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Interesting idea, I must say that this little displays that I saw in your posted pictures made me intrigued by what the books has to say about them.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/the-museum-of-communicating-objects/36588/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-10-05T12:39:26-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


