<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Detroit, As Is: Photographs : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/detroit-as-is-photographs/37544/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-12-15T11:12:25-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Detroit, As Is: Photographs"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[While I share your concern about the dominant visual representation of Detroit, I wouldn't include Jordano's work in the negative category.  Jordano's images clearly don't dwell on death, and they certainly don't argue that Detroit is "beyond repair" or "lost forever." On the contrary, he is producing a complex and dignified portrait of Detroit that includes the range of positive and negative examples of life in the city. <br />
<br />
Take another look at the essay, and I think you'll find that "repair" and "revitalization" are clearly represented through families fixing up homes, starting businesses, maintaining longstanding firms and working to improve their communities. The essay doesn't sugar coat the city's story, but it makes clear that Detroit has a past, present and future.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/detroit-as-is-photographs/37544/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-12-15T11:12:25-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Detroit, As Is: Photographs"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[While it's interesting to see and study Detroit, "As is" I feel that DD (Detroit Decay) photography has spawned its own mythology of what Detroit is and will be. The idea that Detroit is dead will kill any hope it has for being reborn. What about those that are trying to rebuild and change its economy? Are there new entrepreneurs, builders, creators there? Someone must be able able to afford tickets to Tigers games.... <br />
The fact is, Detroit is one of the few cities that didn't diversify it's economy very well--not the norm for America--all of its chips where in the car industry. But it still has other businesses. Other cities in America continue to thrive based on being able to adapt--new technology, new business, new economies. <br />
These images reflect our cultural obsession with decay, reflecting our fear of death. <br />
If we are going to focus on Detroit (and not, say, Cleveland, Pittsburg, Memphis, St. Louis or any city) we should at least try to find out who is trying to revitalize it. Or at least give a broader impression of what Detroit is, not only seeking out the "beauty in the death." Or we can just reinforce the impression that this is a place beyond repair, lost forever. ]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/detroit-as-is-photographs/37544/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2012-12-06T17:30:28-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


