<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-02-18T13:01:09-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Also: There are quite a few comments in a post about this at Boing Boing, some very interesting. For those interested: <br />
http://boingboing.net/2013/02/13/proposal-for-a-new-punctuation.html]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-18T13:01:09-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Wow, what a great set of responses. Clearly this is a problem that needs solving. <br />
<br />
Regarding the interobang: I had completely forgotten about that, but I do love the name.<br />
<br />
Anyway, love all the back and forth here. Thanks all ... rw]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-17T16:47:32-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Perhaps we are trying to create the wrong character? It's fair to say that because of the now ubiquitous employment of the exclamation point, it's changed the meaning. So, instead of creating a new character for what we're all already doing, do we need to create a new mark for what the exclamation point used to mean?<br />
<br />
That said, perhaps we can borrow from Spanish and use the two exclamation points, but in adjacent fashion. Like this:<br />
<br />
Shouting!Â¡ <br />
<br />
Or perhaps something that borrows from math, and denotes that it's an exclamation to a higher power:<br />
<br />
Shouting!^]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-15T20:19:02-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[What about something that looks like a muted exclamation mark?<br />
<br />
Something like this.<br />
<br />
Or this.|.<br />
<br />
Or maybe just this.|]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-15T14:55:15-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA["Already a character for this:<br />
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1ecb/index.htm<br />
U+1ECB<br />
á»"<br />
<br />
I find it a little difficult to realize it's a punctuation mark when it's used in a sentenceá»<br />
<br />
See?]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-15T13:42:29-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Already a character for this:<br />
<br />
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1ecb/index.htm<br />
<br />
U+1ECB<br />
<br />
á»<br />
<br />
]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-14T17:49:14-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I never knew about the "interpunct" Â·âÂ·<br />
Good one. I think that wins the sideways contenders, hands down.<br />
<br />
Regarding the interrobang, it appears that you can paste that one: â½<br />
(even if you can't type it) also... "On Mac OS X, it is found on the Character Palette, obtained by pressing the key combination â Cmd+â¥ Opt+T."]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-14T10:17:38-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<i>You are too kind â!â</i><br />
<br />
<b>Tail wagging anyone?</b><br />
Perhaps we should try a little Banana Joe tail wagging by moving our quote marks around the exclamation point.<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://espn.go.com/espn/story/_/id/8942278/banana-joe-affenpinscher-wins-westminster-best-show"> Banana Joe â!â</a><br />
]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-13T19:59:24-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[> In the interim would it not perhaps be simpler to use the vertical bar?<br />
Like this|<br />
<br />
I think the broken bar Â¦ might be more distinguishable and apt.<br />
<br />
By the way, does anyone know why, at least on UK QWERTY keyboards, the Â¦  and | give each others' symbols? I'll give that a quick google....]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-13T19:13:08-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Scott Raney, there is the interrobang.<br />
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interobang<br />
I'd prefer to see the interrobang added to the regular keyboard; I find the need to express incredulity far more often than I have the need to express friendliness. ]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-13T14:23:28-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I really like the idea behind this new mark, but the form of the mark seems out of place and doesn't seem grounded to the line of text. I think it is strange to have a mark comprised of three parts. Maybe the solution resides somewhere between a "?" and a "!."]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-13T14:09:46-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[In the interim would it not perhaps be simpler to use the vertical bar?<br />
Like this|]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-13T09:04:30-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Interpunct and en dash to the resque Â·âÂ·]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-12T18:49:33-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[I think the ! is still valid, as it seems to communicate a certain amount of sincerity while the # mark in twitter seems to be slightly sarcastic. <br />
Maybe the new mark can mean sincerity without the energy. ]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-12T17:49:42-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Worth considering Beach, and I like keeping my finger on the option key throughout, but I am struggling with the enthusiasm issue. Thanks for the suggestion<br />
]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-12T16:45:09-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Might line up better this way â¢ââ¢<br />
[bullet n-dash bullet] <br />
Unless you feel that the bullets make too bold of a punctuation mark for the more half-hearted enthusiasm you seek to express...]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-12T15:42:14-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Love the idea.-. <br />
<br />
And very neatly designed: love the tapering nature of the mark in the middle, Please let it catch on.-.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-12T14:35:23-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "A proposed addition to the way we punctuate now"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[While communicating my enthusiasm for this post on Facebook, I realized that an interim solution is needed between now and the inevitable moment when the mark is embraced by official channels. So I came up with an ascii version of the ElRey. It is .â. <br />
<br />
Let unbridled semi-enthusiastic communication begin .â.]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://observatory.designobserver.com/feature/lets-make-a-mark/37679/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-12T10:08:33-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


