<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Mariana Van Rensselaer and the Rise of Architecture Criticism : Responses</title>
<description>Design Observer ::Â Join the Discussion</description>
<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/mariana-van-rensselaer-architecture-criticism/37694/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Design Observer Group</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-02-26T23:59:18-05:00</dc:date>
<copyright>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0</copyright>




<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Mariana Van Rensselaer and the Rise of Architecture Criticism"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[This article harkens back to a wonderful time in history, when architecture critics used to write about the architecture. Ahh, history. I miss the 2000s. ]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/mariana-van-rensselaer-architecture-criticism/37694/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-26T23:59:18-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Mariana Van Rensselaer and the Rise of Architecture Criticism"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[An interesting introduction to this forgotten critic, the first two paragraphs and last paragraphs of this study seem very speculative and full of narrow generalizations about the role of women and men in architecture. ]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/mariana-van-rensselaer-architecture-criticism/37694/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-26T18:47:30-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Mariana Van Rensselaer and the Rise of Architecture Criticism"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[BTW Louis Mumford = Lewis Mumford]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/mariana-van-rensselaer-architecture-criticism/37694/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-26T13:17:28-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Responding to "Mariana Van Rensselaer and the Rise of Architecture Criticism"]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Louis Mumford on Van Rensselaer: âShe was too near Richardson in time, when she wrote the biography, to see his work in full perspective; hence her over emphasis on the more conventional part of his career, and her failure to give sufficient attention to his departuresâwhose full significance could in fact only be interpreted later, in terms of what they led to.â¦.but after Richardson, she succumbed to the general drift toward eclecticism with the emphasis on McKim Mead and Whiteâs Renaissance; so her architectural criticism, though copious, did not do for the layman what Montgomery Schuyler was doing for the professional in interpreting and supporting the innovators. For all that, Mrs. Van Rensselaer was a pioneer whose work deserves inclusion in this broad panorama; and her fine essay on the architect and client neatly complements that of John Root.â<br />
<br />
Not sure about the argument that all of these critics were uneducated outsidersâAda Louise Huxtable, most notably worked under Phillip Johnson at the MoMA, where she learned about modern architecture. Van Rensselaer seems to have a close relationship with Richardson, etc. All where from high society, as well, and didn't seem to care about the lower classes. <br />
<br />
Did you know that Van Rensselaer also wrote against womenâs suffrage, in Should We Ask for the Suffrage (1894) claiming that it is against natural law? Seems like we should put this womanâs views about things, especially given the female slant of this article, in context. Not so much a kick in the pants, it seems, as a reinforcement of the status quo (which of course, is always more marketable). I wouldn't look to her as a feminist role model, or a model for current architectural criticism, less you think that Good Housekeeping is as far as women should go. <br />
]]></description>
	<author></author>
	<link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/mariana-van-rensselaer-architecture-criticism/37694/#comments</link>
	<dc:date>2013-02-26T13:12:31-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</channel>
</rss>

	


