show

Mark Lamster

Can the Doomed Astrodome Save Modernism?




Earlier this week, Houston voters declined to fund a bond initiative to renovate the Astrodome, meaning the landmark bubble known as the Eighth Wonder of the World is likely to be demolished. It's a bitter pill. The historical significance of the building as the first multipurpose domed stadium is considerable, and its various innovations are remarkable testaments to the outsized, can-do spirit that defined America generally and Texas in particular at midcentury. Here was a building that befitted a city and a nation shooting men into space. 

If it never worked perfectly, the place had a sense of optimism about it. How could you not be charmed by such an enormous, open room with its luminous, lucite panel ceiling? The place had its own weather patterns, not to mention female ushers — Spacettes — who wandered the aisles in gold lame, an electronic scoreboard before they were a commonplace, and of course its eponymous fake grass. (Installed after the real stuff failed to grow.) This was the future, a pleasure dome, surrounded by an ocean of parking, a place suited to an automotive city.

The Astros never managed a World Series in the place — but, oh, those uniforms — and the Oilers didn't win the Super Bowl. So what? Billie Jean King dispatched Bobby Riggs in their famous Battle of the Sexes, one of the signal moments in 20th century American culture.

In a recent article in Architect magazine tied to the destruction of Prentice Hospital in Chicago — another travesty — my Design Observer colleague Alexandra Lange suggested the modern preservation movement was in need of a Penn Station Moment; the destruction of a monument so beloved that it would galvanize a movement to prevent future travesties. The Astrodome is as good a test case for that theory as one could hope to find. It is the single most recognizable building in Houston, a symbol of the city, and if it is lost, the city will regret its decision for generations to come. (It's truly hard to imagine a city intentionally destroying its signature work of architecture.) 

But for all that, if it is torn down, I strongly suspect it will fail to inspire a movement. I doubt any building could. I suspect the future will be about incremental gains and losses, and the best those of us who believe in modern preservation can do is fight the good fight as best we can, using every tool available. It's not going to come easy. 

To the barricades!

@marklamster

Posted in: Architecture, Preservation

Comment 5  |     |     |   Like 0  |   Tweet 16
Comments [5]
The design media has become so toxified with bullshit that we have been led to believe that Prentice Hospital (or the Astrodome, sorry) were worth saving because they symbolize something; was it the branded term "Brutalism" or is it now "american optimism."

They are ugly, decrepit, not useful buildings. They are not firm, commodified or delightful. Penn Station was a rich piece of architecture worth saving. These, not so much.

I think it's time to go back to judging things based on what they are, not the gimmicky term of the week that they symbolize.

Kevin J. Hogan
11.07.13
01:09

"ugly, decrepit, not useful"

the first is your opinio, and the latter two can be ameliorated. i don't think there's anything "gimmicky" about the attachment so many have to a building that is in many ways extraordinary, and has been an important part of local and national history.
Mark Lamster
11.07.13
10:58

I would have hope by now the discussion about conserving built history had moved beyond a discussion about aesthetic merit.
The discussion needs to include a full understanding of the time and times since. Without that, no meaningful answer can be rendered, and then everything subverts to the balance sheet.
Jonathan
11.11.13
12:48

Moved beyond aesthetic merit?

I find it strange that any other critique would be useful. Not that other meanings don't have there value, but at the end of the day, a beautiful building is confirmed by popular sentiment as well as thoughtful critique which is not common these days. I don't think it's useful to judge buildings by what period or style they have, but by the craft and skill of its particular context. If the Astrodome is beloved, then so be it, but if not, it doesn't have any real use.
Brian J. McKnight
11.12.13
11:10

Have you heard about the loss of the Civic Arena--the world's first retractable dome sports arena--in Pittsburgh?
Rob Henning
11.12.13
09:45



Creative Opportunities
  • Twitter Facebook Google+
    Tumblr Pinterest RSS

    Design Observer
    social media à la carte
  • Newsletter signup

  • Design Jobs
    Observer Jobs Spotlight