11.12.13
Paul Polak and Mal Warwick | Essays

How to Solve India’s Poverty Crisis


Photo by Juanlu Sánchez

Economic debate swirls around the question of how to end poverty, and no wonder: today there are still 2.7 billion people living on $2 a day or less. How should a nation that contains nearly one in three of the world’s poorest people address this very real problem? At one extreme among Indian observers, Nobel Prize winner and Harvard professor Amartya Sen urges greater government investment in programs to aid the poor. At the other, Jagdish Bhagwati, Columbia professor and leading trade economist, insists on the need to fuel the growth of industry and the middle class. From our experience in India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Zimbabwe, and many other countries, we believe that both are wrong.

The conventional definition of economic growth — increase in average per capita GDP — is totally irrelevant to people living in extreme poverty. If you’re one of 400 million people in India earning $400 a year or less and the board chairman of Reliance Industries earns $18 million, the fact that the average per capita income between the two of you is $9,000,200 will give you scant comfort.

Economists have it all wrong

Throughout the poor countries of the Global South, the economic growth reflected in per capita GDP is overwhelmingly commercial, industrial, and urban, with little direct impact on rural areas, where most extremely poor people live. India has experienced almost eight percent annual GDP growth over the past decade, but according to the World Bank, two-thirds of the population still lives on less than $2 a day, and there are still 300 million people who go hungry — despite far-reaching but ineffective government programs to provide schooling, feed children, and directly subsidize some of the poor. We do not see any hope that increased investment either in conventional economic growth or in government assistance programs is likely to do any better.

The only effective large-scale answer to extreme poverty is to stimulate rapid scalable growth centered specifically in the villages where most poor people live, not urban-centered growth that generates only a trivial trickle-down impact. If you ask poor people why they’re poor, as we have, they’ll freely tell you they simply don’t have enough money.

Three ways to end poverty

However, we see three effective ways to address the challenge of poverty: by (a) helping poor people develop income-generating businesses of their own; (b) providing jobs that allow them to increase their incomes through wages or salaries; or (c) selling them products that enable them to earn or save money.

We’re all familiar with the global effort to help poor people build their own businesses through microcredit — an effort that has brought mixed results. (The biggest problem is that most microloans are used for consumption, not to build businesses.) But where are the market-based solutions that deliver jobs in large numbers to the bottom billions or products that help them increase their incomes? Sadly, there are all too few, and none has reached meaningful scale.

Limitless opportunities for business

The opportunities are there for all to see:

  • At least a billion poor farmers around the world lack access to affordable income-generating tools such as small-plot irrigation, information on how to farm better, and access to markets for the crops they grow.
  • At least a billion poor farmers lack access to crop insurance, and even greater numbers have no access to health and accident insurance that could lessen their financial challenges.
  • Nearly one billion people in the world go hungry on any given night, and an equal number lack access to affordable nutritious foods.
  • More than a billion people live in rudimentary shelters, constituting a ready market for $100 to $300 houses with market and collateral value that could start them on the road to the middle class
  • At least one billion people have neither latrines nor toilets
  • More than one billion people have no access to electricity
  • One billion or more don’t have access to decent, affordable schools
  • A minimum of one billion people lack affordable and professional health services.
  • At least one billion use cooking and heating methods that make them sick and pollute the air.
We believe that all these areas, and many more, offer huge opportunities to create profitable global companies capable of transforming business as usual and reducing the incidence of extreme poverty in the process. They’re just waiting for imaginative entrepreneurs or existing businesses ready to tackle the challenges of radical affordability, last-mile delivery, culturally appropriate marketing, and, above all, design for scale.

If just 100 new businesses set out on this path, committing themselves to attract 100 million customers each in the first ten years, generating at least $10 billion in annual sales, and earning generous enough profits to attract mainstream capital, we would see, at long last, meaningful progress in the global fight against poverty. It’s time to stop theorizing and get down to business.

Posted in: Cities + Places, Development, India, Poverty, Social Enterprise


Comments [2]

Let me first introduce my self, I am a Product Design graduate from India, and I have worked with a couple of projects in the social sector and I very much agree with your views about approaching this problem not by asking "If you ask poor people why they’re poor, as we have, they’ll freely tell you they simply don’t have enough money" and i also very much agree with your approach of empowering them with products to solve their basic needs first. I have worked on a couple of social product biased projects towards empowering the people in the lower economic strata, I might not have a lot of experience in this field as I am a recent graduate. But I have noticed one common occurring through out my projects, implementation. I do not mean selling the products in the market or a distribution networks. I mean the acceptability of the products by the people. It is very difficult to change their habit and that is where i feel the major problem lies and to solve this problem. Their process and way of performing tasks has been the same over generation's, without any influence of change from the outside world that has changed in so many ways. I feel we should first understand there process of acceptability. How a trust in a certain product or process develops and their view towards a particular task and how they perform them. We should not be to radical with our concepts going away from their habit of performing tasks, but what we should do is try to integrate and mold our designs around their lifestyle. These are my personal views and I am not sure how applicable they actually are. But I believe if we are to take the said approach this would the very essential.
Sahaj Ghose
07.16.14
11:33

I really agree with your last sentence that it's time to stop theorizing and get down to business. From your generated stats here, I can see the potential in the market, while yet the obstacles we will definitely face on the way of change. The large population base of India makes every revolutionary change take longer term to react. The poor Indians here enter into the cycle of poverty, where poor families become trapped in poverty for generations. Without forceful help from the outside, the poor hierarchy will even not have any single opportunity to escape from the cycle. However, due to the specialty of Indian culture and religion, we need to take all these concerns when we try to figure out the most feasible solutions and solve people's basic problems. Intention and attitude are always good for action, but all should be taken on the basis of understanding. While a journey of thousand miles begins with a single step, we should combine power from all aspects of the society and together conquer the problem together.
Rubin Qiang
10.28.14
02:30



Jobs | November 14