show

Rob Walker

More Google Image Fun


"Google Vase," by Daniel Michel

In a post here a few months back, I argued Google Image search results for terms like “Mona Lisa” and so on could be seen as something like digital readymades — image clusters that form a new image with its own intrinsic visual interest and meaning. (I was originally indirectly inspired by an exchange with Dave Winer, and his post here about searching for a genuine image of the Mona Lisa). Since then I’ve occasionally made new searches, out of curiosity, and a couple of weeks ago began to keep the results in one place: http://pergoogle.tumblr.com/.

As you’ll see, if you choose to browse the results, I took Rick Poynor’s advice to search for “lips,” for instance. More recently, I was thinking about the hubbub over that picture of a couple embracing amid the Vancouver riot earlier this year, and searched “riot kiss.”  I’ve searched a few more names of famous artworks or monuments, and other terms that made me curious: what would a Google Image search give me in response to “Swoosh,” or “snapshot,” or “anonymous,” or even “Google”? Would “favorite Beatle” produce something much different than “favourite Beatle”? After posting here about pictures of the familiar, I searched "Most photographed barn in America." The other day I searched for "black." And so on.

I mentioned this in my sporadic email newsletter recently, and got some highly useful responses. Gladys Santiago sent me a great batch of search-term suggestions — I think I like the result for "audience" the best.

Linda Eckstein pointed me to this post last year on her blog, All My Eyes: Searching Luis Melendez mostly yielded still life paintings by the 18th century Spanish artist — but stuck among those images was a 2007 wanted poster for Luis Melendez, a convicted cocaine trafficker sought by the New Bedford police! Seperately, she also alerted me to the existence of Daniel Michel's "Google Vase," described by the artist as "a vase created by the work with the term itself. Researched pictures were collected and analized. The rotation outlines of 8 vases were arranged around a centre and connected by minimal surfaces in a 3D construction software. Afterwards the textures were set on the surfaces and the vase was printed by a 3D-Printer."

Finally, James Gaddy responded with his own variation on Google Image search results. "Paper, Large Only" involved a search for "paper," but (as the title suggests) using Google's option to narrow results by file size — large only, in this case. He's presented results as a slide show — and it's pretty interesting!

And the point of my writing about all this is what? One answer is that it's a visual experiment in human-machine collaboration: A kind of meaning is revealed by these algorithm-driven composites, the specific collection of images Google spits back in response to whatever word or phrase I type in, and something genuinely new emerges in the way the thumbnails relate to each other. Very learned critiques, I believe, could be extracted from, or imposed upon, these digital things.

The other answer is that it's fun.

The first result from James Gaddy's "Paper, Large Only" search, presented here in small format that sort of undercuts the whole  point.

 





Comment 7  |     |     |   Like 0  |   Tweet 0
Rob Walker Rob Walker is a technology and culture columnist for Yahoo News. He is the former Consumed columnist for The New York Times Magazine, and has contributed to many publications. He is co-editor (with Joshua Glenn) of the book Significant Objects: 100 Extraordinary Stories About Ordinary Things, and author of Buying In: The Secret Dialogue Between What We Buy and Who We Are.

MORE

Comments [7]
Super interesting, thank you.

A while ago I had the idea of making a series of zines containing collection of amusingly monotonous Google Images results; My favorite were "gift basket" and "dance team", you should try them.
Yotam Hadar
10.19.11
05:25

Try searching "google image search" and what pops up. Kind of like the dream sequence in the Being John Malkovich film. Well not really but made me think of that movie for some reason. Later…

VR/
Joe Moran
10.20.11
07:43

Yes, we are all postmodernists now, aren't we? Baudrillard couldn't have imagined it any better...
hypotheticalpasserby
10.22.11
01:50

Thanks to all above for the enjoyable feedback. (And @Yotam, I love the idea of dealing with this concept in the print zine form ... )

In addition, several interesting responses to this post have come to me via email, so I will pass along relevant links here.

Matroid Blues has two projects that I wasn't aware of but that are certainly relevant to this exploration:

The Color of Emotions and Others:
http://matroidblues.com/?p=84
Google Color:
http://matroidblues.com/?p=67

Really cool.

Also notable: Mark Luthringer's "Ridgemont Typologies":
http://www.markluthringer.com/markluthringerra.html

Check it out. There's more stuff on his site that is also relevant.

There were other things emailed to me, but that do not have links. If you have more interesting related examples to add, I hope you will do so in the comments here.
Rob Walker
10.25.11
06:46

I like to do keyword searches on Ebay of terms like 'treasured' 'important' and 'museum quality'. 'Heirloom' used to be fruitful too but now you have to wade through all those seeds for sale.
geecee
10.26.11
08:45

try searching for "what"
or "find chuck norris"
TeenArchitect
10.30.11
07:36

Brilliant article!I have just sat here search random words!whoop and Uh oh are good!
james bleach
11.03.11
06:27



Creative Opportunities
  • Twitter Facebook Google+
    Tumblr Pinterest RSS

    Design Observer
    social media à la carte
  • Newsletter signup