03.15.16
Adrian Shaughnessy | Essays

Music by the Numbers



When I was a music-mad youth with no money beyond what I needed for rent, food, and the weekly purchase of an inky music paper, I ached with the impossibility of owning certain records. My inability to buy these artefacts turned them into objects of mythic unattainability—jewels that could only be enjoyed by reading about them in the music press, or occasionally hearing them on late night radio shows. 

Later, when I could afford all the music I wanted, I built up a vast collection of CDs, LPs, and tapes. I enjoyed hunting for them; I enjoyed the search for the stuff that really mattered to me. And now I have floor-to-ceiling shelves packed with CDs. I have enough vinyl records, picture discs, and box sets to open a small record shop. And I have shoeboxes full of long forgotten audio formats—minidiscs, DATs, SACDs, CD-Rs, 3-inch CDs, and promotional memory sticks. 

But today these trophies of my musical infatuation lie untouched, forming a sort of silent mausoleum to my long-standing obsession with music of all kinds. And as they slowly acquire the dull patina of neglect, my musical needs are served by the new online streaming services that offer a cosmos of music in exchange for the physical expenditure of a few keystrokes, and a small monthly fee.

Yet this accessibility to everything has not led to an increase in my interest in music. Instead, it has resulted in a gradual unmooring of my connections with the music I love. I feel a mild sense of dislocation and disaffection from the world of music—a world that, for me, dawned with a virulent obsession with teenage pop and eventually led to an enchantment with the string quartets of Arnold Schoenberg, the cosmic jazz of Sun Ra, the bone-dry electronica of Boards of Canada, and myriad other examples of radical musical expression.  


The streaming sites have taken away the ache of not owning. And I now realize that the ache was the attraction. It was a combination of the search, the wait, and the delayed gratification that made the records great. What do you crave when you have everything, except perhaps a craving for craving? 

That’s not all streaming has taken away. Let’s put to one side the deleterious effects of audio compression, the thing I miss most is the sense of personal discovery that comes with hanging about in record shops and at record fairs. In his book Every Song Ever: Twenty Ways to Listen to Music Now, the New York Times music critic Ben Ratliff writes: “Listening to anything, especially when you haven’t heard it before, is a highly creative act; but a little less so, I think, when you let the computers do the choosing for you, when you listen through if-you-like-x-you’ll-like-y recommendation engines, based on your perceived listening patterns, and whatever else your streaming service may know about you.”

Algorithmic recommendations have led me to some interesting discoveries, although far fewer than I got from good music writing or the recommendations of flesh and blood friends. I’m also forced to wade through some screwy algorithmic selections – stream a Peggy Lee track and Celine Dion might turn up in your you-will-like-this box. Far from extending choice, the algorithmic deejay behind the screen restricts choice by sheep-herding users into musical cul-de-sacs. 

The greatest cause of my dislocation, however, is the contextual thinness of streaming services. It can be argued that music is an immaterial experience, and can be divorced from what Ben Ratliff calls the “metadata.” He writes: “Online listening, great as it is, hides the metadata from you. The tiny amount of information you are given is rendered uniformly in the streaming service’s typesetting and format.” 

Only getting a “tiny amount of information” is exactly what I find so disengaging. I want credits. I want biographies. I want criticism and expert reflection. I want the music and not a database sitting on an air-conditioned server farm. But just as music on radio has been neutered by computerised playlists, the personal music stations we all carry around with us have also been taken over by machines.


I’m listening to Spotify as I write this—Laurel Halo, in case you’re interested. Later I’ll look up something on You Tube. I might log onto Tidal or SoundCloud. I’ll do this because streaming has made even loading a CD seem like hard work. And anyway, I’m pushed for time, not to mention stuck on my computer for the rest of the day. 

But because I no longer have the ache—the pain of wanting that which I cannot have—listening to music is not the semi-miraculous experience it was once. Streaming sites have resulted in the suburbanization of music. 


Posted in: Music , Technology


Comments [3]

But biographies, criticism and expert reflection were never embedded into physical media—they lived in the press, or in the conversations you had with your mates. So I don't think it's fair to criticise digital streaming services for not including these things. And in defence of online music... When I was a kid we lived in the middle of nowhere, and could only get to a record shop on the odd occasion that my father felt like driving me there. So more often than not I came home with a distinctly Dad-orientated choice, like something by Genesis. (No offence Phil). Thus I didn't have the ache because... I didn't know what I wanted... or more accurately, what I was missing out on. Has Spotify made me a more lazy consumer of music? Yes. But it has also made music more easily available than ever before. Whilst this is undoubtedly changing our relationship with music, more people than ever are going to live music events. Bands are still finding fans. People still give a shit about music. And I know my 11-year old self would have enjoyed being able to listen to something other than Dad rock.
James Greig
03.15.16
07:26

I only started buying vinyl after streaming services were already a thing but I still have “the ache of not owning”. I started my vinyl collection because I felt an attraction for the magical experience of holding the artwork, reading the notes, dropping the needle on the records, etc. I still use Spotify to find new music but I only feel completely satisfied when I bring my favourite finds home and put them on the shelf. So I guess today the magic for me is in the experience and not in the music itself. Streaming sites can’t ruin that.
Gonçalo
03.15.16
08:13

Interesting post. I too grew up in the era of the LP, etc. and I think that has a lot to do with why streaming sites don't appeal to me. I enjoy having a collection of music and lining up albums for the day rather than letting a streaming site determine what comes up next. It only takes a few minutes in the morning to line up 8 hours of music and this can be easily and quickly adjusted as the day goes on as needed. Between online content and digital file availability my need for obsession is easily filled. Digital is different for me than physical media was, sure — I miss some things about vinyl, etc. but there are also things about the digital era that are better so it evens out. I think this article in some ways is more about the ease of streaming and other things drawing away your attention which is outweighing your love of obsessing over music. Is this bad? Not necessarily if it's been replaced by things you love more.
JON JORCZAK
03.15.16
09:43



Jobs | November 14