show

John Thackara

Rotterdam: Where Time is no Longer Money




Twelve-year-old children in Rotterdam have never known a time when their city was not being rebuilt around them. And because they know no better, or at least no different, they are not much daunted by the huge scale of the projects underway — still less, by the consequences those projects are likely to have for the nature of their city.

I pondered these thoughts when fighting my way through the vast building site that was once Rotterdam Central Station — but will be, when finished, one day, a multi-modal, six-layered hub for high speed trains, buses, cars and lots and lots of shoppers.

(I know my photo looks over-exposed — but I couldn't help comparing the massive floodlights in the artist's impression of the station-to-be, with the massive amount of free light available from the sun on that same spot.)

When planning started, many moons ago, it was envisaged that the new hub would boast (and in part be paid for by) vast office towers plonked on top; but those have been cancelled. What *is* getting built is a "new heart for Rotterdam" that will contain...shops and casinos. Whether any human beings will enter them, when finished, remains to be seen.

These reflections were all good preparation for my talk about “The True Costs of Big” at a conference in the city organized by de Architect.

The speaker from Arup said that cities needed to go vertical — and showed us slides of proposals for vertical green buildings through the ages — all with green stuff on them. I was compelled to say that a vertical farm costing 2,000 euros a square metre upards to construct might not be economically optimal — especially when the average lettuce costs one euro (or three lettuces for two euros in our local and decidedly horizontal market).

At the conference, most of the architects and developers agreed that Mindless Big was over, but that some large projects would still need to happen.

Well, we shall see. If Big is like Fast, its prospects are not great. On my way back from Rotterdam to Amsterdam, I got into a new Fyra intercity train.



The Fyra was curiously — as in, only me in the carriage — empty. It turned out that you have to pay a 12.50 euro ($18) surcharge to go in it. My Fyra was leaving seven minutes before a normal intercity train from the opposite platform and does the journey 20 minutes faster. But the conductor on my Fyra told me "everyone is taking the normal train" because no Dutch person will pay 12.50 euros to save half an hour travel time on a one hour journey.  



Posted in: Cities + Places, Transportation

Comment 6  |     |     |   Like 0  |   Tweet 0
Comments [6]
Nice. Modern technologies let us build things very big and fast, but is that what people really want to experience?
Tom Sanocki
04.25.11
09:32

It might be rare that such city in the Western world is under developing for more than a decade, but it's the reality that most city-dwellers are living under in many cities in various Asian countries, namely China.
Andre Chan
04.25.11
10:12

Hi John,

I guess you confused things...the surcharge is 2.50 euros compared to the normal train. It used to be much more, but nobody used it...So they changed the price, and now the traffic increases. I guess Dutch will prefer it in the longrun although they are a bit stingy. However, travelling with the slow one you do see the tulip fields during the spring, which is priceless ;)
loucaspapa
04.27.11
12:53

Loucas, You may be right about the numbers; as it happens, the guard did not make me pay a surcharge because my credit card would not work in her machine [and I exaggerated my stupid foreigner act, which is pretty convincing even when I'm not acting]. But if you are right, and the surcharge is just 2.50, does it not strengthen my story? I promise you that a platform full of people did *not* get on 'my' Fyra because a regular 20-minutes-slower train was following seven minutes later...
John Thackara
04.28.11
02:24

I appreciate a bit of hyperbole. I am also distraught that the RDam central station is going to become a shopping center / casino. I wasn't aware of that new program, although when its done they can begin removing the Lijnbaan! It reminds me of Utrecht's central station, planned in the 70's as a huge shopping mall, which today confuses and alienates visitors arriving to Utrecht.
Nels Nelson
05.26.11
02:40

Having been born in 1948 I remember Rotterdam as a city where there was building going on due to the Germans bombing the city in May 1940. The whole centre was a construction site with the charred remains of the Laurens church in the middle. I think Rotterdamers in general are used to living on a building site where it always rains. It speaks to their can and will do mentality. The tragedy is that they have never been able to transform the site it into a living city.
Peter van Gorsel
06.16.11
10:00



Creative Opportunities
  • Twitter Facebook Google+
    Tumblr Pinterest RSS

    Design Observer
    social media à la carte
  • Newsletter signup

  • Design Jobs
    Observer Jobs Spotlight




Places Journal
Mail Chimp