
Today's the official publication date of my first book, Seventy-nine Short Essays on Design.
Here are some warnings up front. It is a 272-page book about design that contains no pictures. Each essay, as you may have heard, is published in a different typeface, and you may not find every typeface equally easy to read. And 68 of the pieces in the book were previously published on Design Observer, in one form or another, which means you can read most of them for free here.
So, then, why a book?
Good question. Here's another one: why write about design at all? I still remember the first time I tried. More than twenty years ago, I was asked to write something for Statements, the magazine of the late, great American Center for Design. It was a special issue on design education, and I was probably the youngest contributor. The others were educators, professors with advanced degrees, people who had published a lot of things. I was a relatively recent design school graduate staring at a blank piece of paper. And staring, and staring.
Many tortured hours later, I finally had written something. I read it over. My favorite high school English teacher, Ms. Wagy, might have approved. It was grammatically impeccable, balanced, neutral. It was also self-important and boring. It sounded exactly like...well, Writing. What it didn't sound like was me.
I decided to try something else. I wasn't an expert on design education, but God knows that had never stopped me from offering strong opinions about it in conversation. I decided to see what would happen to just write down the kind of thing I would say out loud. It was vivid, intemperate and unfair. What it wasn't was boring. This was the version I submitted to the ACD, and this was the version they printed. Later, I got two letters: a mildly angry three-page one from one of my favorite design teachers, Gordon Salchow, who felt the piece was superficial and simplistic, and a one-sentence note from a hero of mine I had never met, Ralph Caplan, who said he liked it. I was thrilled that two people had each read something I wrote and reacted so strongly to it that they had to write and mail me — yes, back then with a stamp and everything — a letter.
That piece, "Why Designers Can't Think," is the second essay in the book. In my desperation I had discovered a trick I thought was my own invention. Later, reading books about how to write like On Writing Well by Bill Zinsser and Bird by Bird by Annie Lamott, I found out my discovery was the oldest, and most obvious, trick in the book: make sure you have something to say, and say it in as straightforward a way as possible. It's that first part that's difficult, of course.
I wrote more over the years, and it's never gotten easier. I had really great editors: Steve Heller at AIGA Journal, Chee Pearlman at ID, Rick Poynor at Eye. But while I took great satisfaction in sending off a finished piece, three things always frustrated me: the agony of the looming deadline, the endless wait for publication, and the lack of evidence that anyone had actually read it. All three of these complaints evaporated when I was asked almost four years ago by Rick, Bill Drenttel and Jessica Helfand to join them here at Design Observer. Smart people can disagree about whether blogs are equal to print as a medium for design writing. All I know is — over 100 posts later — this format, with its ready accommodation of impulse, feedback and gratification, works for me.
When I was younger, there was always plenty of time to think about design, to talk about design, to actually do design. With experience comes facileness, and the thinking, talking and doing come and go in a blur. I've found that writing is a way to slow things down again, to question my own premises, to force myself to pay attention to things I might otherwise file away after the quick glance. Often, when I finish a piece and publish it on this site, I'm afraid that it's too personal. Every response I get surprises me as much as those two letters I got for my first little piece so long ago.
So why a book? No matter how much I write, I'm still a working designer. Designers make things. Sometimes the ingredients are colors and shapes and typefaces; sometimes the ingredients are ideas and words. And every designer knows that the final form matters. I discovered that putting the words on paper changes the claim those words make on your attention. Is it better? Is it worse? The answer may be different for every reader. As a designer, I am very grateful I've been given the opportunity to let you see for yourself.
Comments [35]
Thanks for all the essays and the good work you do.
05.24.07
03:55
you're so right about this. i'm still very new to the industry, but having worked professionally now for a year and a half already gave my that same insight.
No wonder i start looking at doing design courses again. Though i think my way of creating meaning and 'slowing down' is currently drawing.
anyway... thanks very much for your writing. i enjoy reading it.
cheers,
Taco
05.24.07
05:12
this need for clarity is reflected in your writing and i am looking forward to reading your book.
cheers
marty
05.24.07
07:30
Why a book? Because turning the pages of a book is so much more immersive and enjoyable than scrolling down a website or PDF.
05.24.07
10:16
05.24.07
12:14
Books also show their use. It has been wonderful for me to go back to previously read books and see how I have enjoyed them by the amount of ware that has accumulated on them. I hope that will happen again with your book.
05.24.07
12:18
As for the book, or rather essentially a compilation of previous writings...seems tentative, certainly not what I looked forward to when told that Michael Beirut was about to publish his first book. In truth, I have so admired your Graphic Design, that I would have preferred at minimum a combination of a retrospective with writing. No surprise to anyone, but your writing pales next to your graphic efforts.
Lest this become a bash, I find the greatest value of your writing not in the trite recounting of past anecdotes, nor in the attempts to teach relatively obvious truths pertaining to graphic arts (at least to those over 30), but rather in the observations of an extremely talented and trained eye; a kind of roving collector of valuable insights, trends, and cultural aberrations, particularly as they make easier to understand, the norm. This kind of reportage in the field of graphic arts is your writings' "bread and butter". Truly critical writing of other design fields is best left to those equally well trained and experienced in those subject fields.
05.24.07
01:09
Probably old hat by now, but Will McDonough's talk at TED (back in 2005) addresses this issue with a lot of clarity. Fast forward to 10:39 seconds in or, if you prefer, here's a quote...
"Imagine this as design assignment. Design something that produces oxygen, sequesters carbon, fixes nitrogen, distills water, accrues solar energy as fuel, makes complex sugar into food, creates microclimates, changes colors with the seasons, and self replicates. Why don't we knock that down and write on it?"
05.24.07
01:13
(unless you were being sarcastic. I'm not sure, as the multiple question marks would denote sarcasm in some interweb circles.)
05.24.07
02:15
Although I'm not sure it is printed on recycled paper...?
05.24.07
02:29
05.24.07
04:55
Anyways, I'm not sure what this has to do with this book? Maybe it's a conversation to have with speak up.
I am glad that Michael published this book... mostly because I can write notes in a book I can't do that with a blog. Don't get me wrong, I love reading blogs... but books will always be my first love. When I finish reading them, I don't get the bloodshot eyes.
05.24.07
05:27
05.25.07
12:15
Mr. Bierut: I love/hate your posts in equal measure- mainly because they're very good, and I wish I'd written them instead. Many thanks.
05.25.07
04:11
Congratulations on the book, Michael. I'll definitely be picking it up.
05.25.07
06:56
05.25.07
10:27
I am increasingly intrigued with the vitriol expressed at anyone who dares to share a differing view than those expressed by bloggers. Clearly there is in certain bloggers' following, an admirable loyalty, if bordering on sycophancy. As a writer, MB is a fine Graphic Designer, and all the bullying with sarcasm and ageism to diminish that opinion isn't going to change it. This is not to say that his writing is without value for me; when combined with his graphic work, as occasionally happens during his discussions, it is sometimes invaluable and highly educational.
This weblog, indeed all weblogs, has the potential for far more meaningful dialogue than the rhetoric which occupies 75% of the comments. I suspect that MB supports the right of commentators (albeit some of us could improve our deskside manner) to express our honest opinion.
Michael Bierut injects his opinions into the ether as a distinguished and credentialed graphic designer knowing full well that he does so at the risk, indeed the certainty, of criticism (I've read enough of his writings to feel he does not consider himself a demigod), unless of course, this is a fan club.
I find in the 'blogging generation' (if I may), a very real fear to challenge, and risk...to provoke, which is reflected in the quality of thought and the quality of work. Proof being that instead of engaging such differing opinions, instead of simply explaining why one thinks differently, it's easier to attack "the invader". It is possible, in my view preferable, to have an exchange, even if heated at times. I would suggest to those of you who prefer a mentality of "blind obedience", a revisitation of Fritz Lang's "Metropolis".
05.25.07
01:15
Until I have read the book, which according to the author was published yesterday, I will withold judgement.
Book reviews of unread books are fairly pointless...
05.25.07
02:38
I have a few things published myself (in France) and I know there's no such thing as holding in your own hands a book you've written from beginning to end oh that grand feeling...
I already hope there will be a volume 2, with "Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Typeface" in it as well.
05.26.07
04:48
05.26.07
05:59
I for one have always had a hard time shaking off the bias of object-oriented valuation. Holding a thing in your hand always seems the very finest accomplishment as a creator, and the most satisfying as a consumer, though the content of the paragraphs within may be identical.
Congratulations Michael. Will seek it out to hold in my hands.
05.26.07
08:25
As much as I love getting the latest to read online there's still nothing like a real book, period.
So, how can one get a signed copy of your new book - will you be making the bookstore rounds?
Thanks and keep up the great work!
peace,
H. Michael Karshis
05.26.07
01:09
Especially I become identified with self-invention trick you mentioned.
05.26.07
06:42
05.27.07
04:16
Fantastic job Michael.
05.27.07
11:49
05.30.07
01:43
> I was under the understanding that
> Poynor was pointing out that blogs are somehow
> inferior to books because of they lack editing.
because of they lack editing?
you did that on purpose, didn't you? :+)
had me going there for a minute, you did...
-bowerbird
05.30.07
11:56
05.31.07
01:49
of what do you mean of?
:P
05.31.07
05:42
06.13.07
07:34
06.23.07
01:30
07.09.07
12:14
07.20.07
06:52
Thanks
10.04.07
01:43
i am an architecture graduate from sudan, who -after 6 months of
unemployment- decided to try my luck as a graphic designer.
so, in my attempt to educate myself "visually".. i found myself
reading ur book!
Honestly i haven't heard of you before and wasn't entirely sure
what graphic design is .. but when i finally put your book down i
became a Michael Bierut fan :D
i found your writings very amusing , very down to earth and very
honest .. which made it a bit hard to believe u r a graphic
designer and not a writer!
i also started reading Debbie Millman's "how to think like a great
graphic designer' , this morning, and guess who was the 1st
interviewee! :D
So, thank you for ur book, and for keeping it real
enas satir,
12.25.08
12:40