August 7, 2014
The Art of Redaction
Not long ago, Blackbag.Gawker.com published a set of images that made what has turned out to be a lasting impression on me.
The short version: In the course of reporting a fascinating investigative piece for USA TODAY about how federal prisoners convert “snitching” into a profitable activity, reporter Brad Heath acquired many documents via Freedom of Information Act requests, from the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Among these were a number that, while not ultimately important to Heath’s report, are visually fascinating.
Before providing the records to Heath, employees of the bureau’s information dissemination division carefully outlined, then excised, the heads and faces from every photograph … leaving behind stark and often oddly shaped voids.
The results are, to put it mildly, surreal. Some evidently come from a retirement-party event; others are apparently drawn from a related powerpoint presentation. (The latter are the ones that, with accidental brilliance, are juxtaposed with phrases whose meaning is decisively shifted by the strange new visual context.)
The upshot is a series of bizarrely crude efforts at identity-supression that seem almost like visual comments on privacy and the surveillance state.
Blunt and artless as they are, these efforts do seem effective, no? I’m partly reminded of John Baldessari’s “dot” blots. But it’s actually the indifference to aesthetics in these images that sets them apart.
I find myself wishing for something like, I don’t know, an Instagram filter, that would convert any snapshot to a the stark version of black-and-white that only a photocopy can provide, enhanced by the insertion of clumsy white boxes over anything recognizable as a face. Or maybe a Chrome extension that did something similar to every image in your browswer.
In any case, these images, to me, aren’t just curiosities. They are statements about the complex dialogue around privacy and control — who gets to see what? The answer here is unequivocal: A FOIA response that is practically a parody of transparency. Ask all the questions you want; your answer is will be a crystal-clear void.
Imagine if somehow this weird occurence translated into some kind of meme: A visual practice of protesting the official-observation culture that the FBI partly represents, utlizing the the agency’s own tactic fending off unwanted eyes — with a simple white, anonymizing box.
Observed
View all
Observed
By Rob Walker
Related Posts
Equity Observer
Ellen McGirt|Essays
Gratitude? HARD PASS
Equity Observer
L’Oreal Thompson Payton|Essays
‘Misogynoir is a distraction’: Moya Bailey on why Kamala Harris (or any U.S. president) is not going to save us
Equity Observer
Ellen McGirt|Essays
I’m looking for a dad in finance
She the People
Aimee Allison|Audio
She the People with Aimee Allison, a new podcast from Design Observer
Recent Posts
‘The creativity just blooms’: “Sing Sing” production designer Ruta Kiskyte on making art with formerly incarcerated cast in a decommissioned prison ‘The American public needs us now more than ever’: Government designers steel for regime change Gratitude? HARD PASSL’Oreal Thompson Payton|Interviews
Cheryl Durst on design, diversity, and defining her own pathRelated Posts
Equity Observer
Ellen McGirt|Essays
Gratitude? HARD PASS
Equity Observer
L’Oreal Thompson Payton|Essays
‘Misogynoir is a distraction’: Moya Bailey on why Kamala Harris (or any U.S. president) is not going to save us
Equity Observer
Ellen McGirt|Essays
I’m looking for a dad in finance
She the People
Aimee Allison|Audio