August 5, 2010
Changing the Focus: Latin American Photography
In the view of Uruguayan writer Eduardo Galeano, commonly identified as the political conscience of Latin America, activism is the intrinsic fuel of Latin American history. Since World War II, leading up to NAFTA’s free-trade negotiations of the 1990s, this aggressive stance became associated with various aspects of Latin American culture — with the notable exception of its art. Indeed, with few exceptions, only in the past two decades has social commentary become a common concern in contemporary Latin American art. Drawing on this recent tradition, Changing the Focus: Latin American Photography 1990–2005, presented earlier this year at the Museum of Latin American Art in Los Angeles, showcases what the show’s promotional texts refer to as “the artist’s personally charged response to local and global issues grounded in the contemporary Latin American experience.”
The survey, curated by Idurre Alonso, features more than seventy-five photo-based pieces by thirty-five artists, from Mexico, Central and South America, and the Caribbean. The show’s chronology separates this work — much of it digital, tackling social and political subject matter — from an earlier era of film photography dominated by folkloric lyricism. Combining established stars such as Vik Muniz, Luis González Palma, and Liliana Porter with notable younger artists like Carlos Garaicoa and Melanie Smith, the show motivates its stated goals along three arcs: surroundings, theatricalization, and irony. Light-boxes, C-prints, installations, gelatin-silver prints, and other photo-based art give rein to photography’s potential across media.
Ostensibly ambitious in its premise, the show nonetheless provides only an average experience, with works devoted to class identity, artificiality and reality, and drug culture boasting the biggest chestnuts. Natalia Iguiñiz’s La otra (The other; 2001), for instance, featuring frontal shots of white housewives and maids of indigenous extraction, deploys the anodyne strategy of neutral juxtaposition to explore class compatibility. Glossy, dioramalike tableaux, such as Daniela Rossell’s Jeanette en la casa de su madre #3 (Jeannette in her mother’s house #3; 2002; from the series Ricas y famosas [Rich and famous]), resemble paeans to the kind of poshed-up lifestyles already fetishized in boutique magazines. Likewise, Teresa Margolles’s Tarjetas para picar cocaina (Cards to cut cocaine; 1997–99), a backlit diptych with one image showing someone cutting the drug with the forensic mug of a drug-war victim beside a second shot of an anonymous man licking white powder off the same photographic card, is too stymied by the stock raciness of the tabloid exposé to be categorized with sharp, socially responsive art.
The potential in Changing the Focus can be glimpsed in the opening galleries treating architecture, a topic that, if fleshed out, could have singlehandedly charted the recent history of social concern in Latin American art. Luis Molina Pantin’s series Estudio informal de la arquitectura hÃbrida, Vol. 1, La Narco-arquitectura y sus contribuciones a la comunidad (Informal study of hybrid architecture, Vol. 1, Narco-architecture and its contributions to community; 2004–5) is a quirky analysis of architecture funded by drug money laundered through the construction industry in Colombia. Though often whimsical in design — modeled on landmark buildings such as the Taj Mahal or on enduring styles such as Neoclassical design — narco-architecture has a strong public presence in Colombia, overstated by Molina Pantin through a promotional format: think muscular real-estate publicity shots, in this case consistent with the clout of drug cartels in Colombia. But the view is far from eulogic. In Parque Jaime Duque 1, a planter obstructs the view of the Taj Mahal look-alike, already compromised by the awkward side angle (here and in the rest of the series, the artist worked without the property owners’ permission, and consequently had little chance to shoot from choice vantages). In this photograph, the disproportion between the building’s pompous scale and small size recalls the jerry-built quality of an architectural folly. Molina Pantin ruthlessly applies this principle of the ersatz across the series to redefine the fraudulence of narco-architecture from a pathological standpoint — very simply, that a corrupt and dangerous business results in unreliable form.
Like Molina Pantin, Alexander Apóstol’s series Residente Pulido Ranchos (Polished resident shanty house; 2003) takes a position on slum conditions using the formal geometry of his subjects, the hill shanties of Caracas that were built between the 1940s and 1960s to accommodate foreign and domestic immigrant influx. Identically sized at over six feet tall and set on the ground to lean against the wall, each print focuses on a single building, which towers slightly over a viewer of average height. Monumentality is also established through low-angle perspective, an obsequious variation on New Objectivism’s dispassionate attention to architectural typology, though Apóstol’s full-color view, which roots for the economic underdog, is sly with charm. Hovering on the edge of twee, the series redeems itself by acknowledging the unsettling tension between empowering solutions and insurmountable problems. On one hand, sharp transitions between building materials indicate how slum residents added floors in defiance of zoning laws; on the other, by digitally plastering over the small windows that do exist, Apóstol emphasizes how the poor opt for more interior space over better ventilation. The result is a home that looks like a citadel or prison.
Carlos Garaicoa’s pop-up book Plaza Vieja (Old square; 1994–2005) contains a fictional architect’s plans to refurbish heritage architecture in Havana. Counter weighing this optimism is his accompanying El sueño de algunas ciudades es llegar a convertirse en otras (The dream of some cities is to become another; 2001), a photograph and a drawing that collectively damn the frailty of constructed imaginaries. Both images present views of solutions — one ideal, the other perilous — employed to stabilize decrepit buildings. Though erring on the cool side of moderate, the installation nonetheless targets the failure of Fidel Castro’s 1970 brainchild, the Microbrigade proposal, encouraging citizens to join a construction task force to resolve the housing deficit, a project abandoned after the fall of Socialism, which resulted in a Havana of incomplete buildings.
A similar misalignment between desire and reality hampers Changing the Focus as a whole. The show’s progressive statement of artists’ charged responses to issues is so generalized that it comes across as forced. Like Castro’s Havana, the show is thwarted by a general lack of supportive mettle. Especially problematic is the prevalence of photographs that look poorly shot and poorly printed. Here, unfortunately, de-skilling is not balanced by conceptual rigor but by flatfooted cheekiness. That said, MOLAA’s heart is in the right place. This is a grand undertaking for a small museum committed to improving the community’s exposure to the best Latin American art. One only wishes that formal excellence, rather than a shaky topical platform, had been the foundation of this commendable venture.
Observed
View all
Observed
By Prajna Desai
Related Posts
Arts + Culture
Alexis Haut|Cinema
‘The creativity just blooms’: “Sing Sing” production designer Ruta Kiskyte on making art with formerly incarcerated cast in a decommissioned prison
Politics
Ashleigh Axios|Analysis
‘The American public needs us now more than ever’: Government designers steel for regime change
Equity Observer
Ellen McGirt|Essays
Gratitude? HARD PASS
Design Juice
L’Oreal Thompson Payton|Interviews
Cheryl Durst on design, diversity, and defining her own path
Recent Posts
‘The creativity just blooms’: “Sing Sing” production designer Ruta Kiskyte on making art with formerly incarcerated cast in a decommissioned prison ‘The American public needs us now more than ever’: Government designers steel for regime change Gratitude? HARD PASSL’Oreal Thompson Payton|Interviews
Cheryl Durst on design, diversity, and defining her own pathRelated Posts
Arts + Culture
Alexis Haut|Cinema
‘The creativity just blooms’: “Sing Sing” production designer Ruta Kiskyte on making art with formerly incarcerated cast in a decommissioned prison
Politics
Ashleigh Axios|Analysis
‘The American public needs us now more than ever’: Government designers steel for regime change
Equity Observer
Ellen McGirt|Essays
Gratitude? HARD PASS
Design Juice
L’Oreal Thompson Payton|Interviews