Meghan O, rsquo, Rourke|Essays
January 14, 2015
Literary Chic
The New York Times described Didion’s response to all the hoopla as being as “as crisp as one of Phoebe Philo’s cotton tunics.” But the fashion world’s reception has been anything but crisp. “Well, did you just feel the collective intake of breath shared by every cool girl you know? Did you feel the pulse-quickening vibrations of every recent college grad and literature fan? Did you sense the earth trembling beneath your feet?” Vogue wrote. The breathless coverage moved Gawker, sensing it had some ripe fodder on its hands, to start a feature called “Joan Didion Watch.” It’s funny—but fitting—that the response is so un-Didionlike. You can be a Fashion Cool Girl who likes the same clothes as the “ultimate” clear-eyed cool girl, it turns out, and not have her brand of cool at all.
Observed
View all
Observed
By Meghan O, rsquo & Rourke
Related Posts
Innovation
Ashleigh Axios|Essays
Innovation needs a darker imagination
Business
Kim Devall|Essays
The most disruptive thing a brand can do is be human
AI Observer
Lee Moreau|Critique
The Wizards of AI are sad and lonely men
Business
Louisa Eunice|Essays
The afterlife of souvenirs: what survives between culture and commerce?
Recent Posts
Wayne Suiter Matamoros|Peru's Sacred Valley
Looking to Latin America for the future design innovation Pope Leo XIV weighed in on the AI conversationJessica Helfand|The Icarus Diaries
20: Deus ex Machina Nina Katz’s answer to growing anti-trans rhetoric: nine larger-than-life portraits of the people she wants you to meetRelated Posts
Innovation
Ashleigh Axios|Essays
Innovation needs a darker imagination
Business
Kim Devall|Essays
The most disruptive thing a brand can do is be human
AI Observer
Lee Moreau|Critique
The Wizards of AI are sad and lonely men
Business
Louisa Eunice|Essays